Indoor Observing?
Moderators: Guy Fennimore, joe, Brian
-
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 1:35 pm
- Location: London, UK.
- Contact:
Indoor Observing?
I was intrigued to read Martin Mobberley's article in last month's Astronomy Now: "A Window on the Sky" about astronomers who observe from indoors. Maybe this is the next step up from "armchair astronomers"??
I'm fortunate enough to have quite big windows fairly high up which give me a good view of most of the eastern half of the sky, and London light pollution not withstanding, I'm often able to make quite good observations looking out of my open windows.
I wondered how many SPA members were sometimes indoor observers?
I'm fortunate enough to have quite big windows fairly high up which give me a good view of most of the eastern half of the sky, and London light pollution not withstanding, I'm often able to make quite good observations looking out of my open windows.
I wondered how many SPA members were sometimes indoor observers?
8x30 (Baigish BPC5, Soviet era) Binocular
8x25 Bak4 Prism (Sun Optical) Binocular
7-21x25 (Helios) Monocular
8x25 Bak4 Prism (Sun Optical) Binocular
7-21x25 (Helios) Monocular
-
- Posts: 5366
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:25 am
- Contact:
Dear Tim,
I have been observing from indoors from about the beginning of time, well it seems that way. And the majority of my astro photos are from indoors.
Anything up to 6 inch Maksutovs and 5 inch refractors.
Thousands of nights outdoors also.
They are not mutually exclusive.
Regarding the views of planets in daylight mentioned elsewhere today, using just the unaided eyes. This is easier and more successful from inside a room rather than outdoors.
Best regards, David
I have been observing from indoors from about the beginning of time, well it seems that way. And the majority of my astro photos are from indoors.
Anything up to 6 inch Maksutovs and 5 inch refractors.
Thousands of nights outdoors also.
They are not mutually exclusive.
Regarding the views of planets in daylight mentioned elsewhere today, using just the unaided eyes. This is easier and more successful from inside a room rather than outdoors.
Best regards, David
-
- Posts: 5622
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:05 am
- Location: Lancashire
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 5366
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:25 am
- Contact:
Dear Brian,
It is both of these plus the fact that indoors you can fix a position by holding your vision onto a window frame etc.
In the open air the sky is so enormous the eye wanders constantly and it is almost impossible to fix your vision on one spot. The eye scans constantly.
If you find Jupiter from indoors, either by accident or locating first with a binocular you can position it with reference to a window frame or marking a dot on the window, or say a cross hair.
The whole task is then much easier.
The only time you could find Jupiter with the Sun above the horizon outside is to fix it with reference to a tree or T.V. mast or ideally if it was very near Venus.
Now is ideal as Venus and Jupiter are closing.
But you don't have the indoor help you mentioned.
And have a go for Mars, it is just bright enough but needs very careful planning.
I saw Mars from indoors about 1991 or 1992 I think, and my Jupiter sightings were from inside a hall with glass panels. I used the building itself to shield my eyes from the Sun and also used clouds when they covered the Sun but not Jupiter. Jupiter was really easy.
It is essential with all these observations that your eyes focus exactly on 'infinity'
I can only do this nowadays with glasses.
Regards, David
It is both of these plus the fact that indoors you can fix a position by holding your vision onto a window frame etc.
In the open air the sky is so enormous the eye wanders constantly and it is almost impossible to fix your vision on one spot. The eye scans constantly.
If you find Jupiter from indoors, either by accident or locating first with a binocular you can position it with reference to a window frame or marking a dot on the window, or say a cross hair.
The whole task is then much easier.
The only time you could find Jupiter with the Sun above the horizon outside is to fix it with reference to a tree or T.V. mast or ideally if it was very near Venus.
Now is ideal as Venus and Jupiter are closing.
But you don't have the indoor help you mentioned.
And have a go for Mars, it is just bright enough but needs very careful planning.
I saw Mars from indoors about 1991 or 1992 I think, and my Jupiter sightings were from inside a hall with glass panels. I used the building itself to shield my eyes from the Sun and also used clouds when they covered the Sun but not Jupiter. Jupiter was really easy.
It is essential with all these observations that your eyes focus exactly on 'infinity'
I can only do this nowadays with glasses.
Regards, David
-
- Posts: 5366
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:25 am
- Contact:
I have tried to follow Saturn into daylight with unaided eyes on numerous occasions but never succeeded or even got close.
Sirius should be possible.
I think the limiting magnitude for a very good observer to see a star or planet with the Sun's disc just above the horizon is magnitude minus 0.5
in ideal conditions with the star or planet in an ideal position.
One should note that published sunrise or sunset times may be for mid Sun's disc and may or may not include refraction, so it is important to establish oneself that the whole of the Sun's disc is above the real horizon, i.e discount houses roofs etc.
David
Sirius should be possible.
I think the limiting magnitude for a very good observer to see a star or planet with the Sun's disc just above the horizon is magnitude minus 0.5
in ideal conditions with the star or planet in an ideal position.
One should note that published sunrise or sunset times may be for mid Sun's disc and may or may not include refraction, so it is important to establish oneself that the whole of the Sun's disc is above the real horizon, i.e discount houses roofs etc.
David
-
- Posts: 5366
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:25 am
- Contact:
It seems that with the rings wide open near opposition Saturn can reach manitude minus 0.49, say mag minus 0.5. This will happen it says on the internet in 2018.
It might just be possible with careful planning for someone to see Saturn then with unaided eyes with the Sun just above the horizon.
I do not recall any claimed unaided eyes sighting of Saturn in daylight, which I define as the Sun at least being completely above the horizon and stritly a sea horizon.
Also say on mount Teide in I think Tenerife or on the top of La Palma the Sun may be about 1 degree below the horizon compared to the view from sea level at the same time.
For southern observers, Canopus might just be visible with the Sun just above the horizon.
Regards, David
It might just be possible with careful planning for someone to see Saturn then with unaided eyes with the Sun just above the horizon.
I do not recall any claimed unaided eyes sighting of Saturn in daylight, which I define as the Sun at least being completely above the horizon and stritly a sea horizon.
Also say on mount Teide in I think Tenerife or on the top of La Palma the Sun may be about 1 degree below the horizon compared to the view from sea level at the same time.
For southern observers, Canopus might just be visible with the Sun just above the horizon.
Regards, David
-
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 6:11 pm
- Location: Portslade, Sussex Lat 50deg 51min Long 0deg 13mins West
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 6:11 pm
- Location: Portslade, Sussex Lat 50deg 51min Long 0deg 13mins West
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 5622
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:05 am
- Location: Lancashire
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 5366
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:25 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 5622
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:05 am
- Location: Lancashire
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 1:35 pm
- Location: London, UK.
- Contact:
Like Mike, I find the added height of observing from indoors (where I'm on the fourth floor) is a real bonus. I don't have to crane back quite so far and the window frame often allows me to steady my bins better.
Mars has been particularly well positioned for viewing from indoors for me the last few nights.
Mars has been particularly well positioned for viewing from indoors for me the last few nights.
8x30 (Baigish BPC5, Soviet era) Binocular
8x25 Bak4 Prism (Sun Optical) Binocular
7-21x25 (Helios) Monocular
8x25 Bak4 Prism (Sun Optical) Binocular
7-21x25 (Helios) Monocular
-
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:00 pm
- Location: north sheffield
- Contact:
I have my 125 in front of my Velux loft window,it gets used a lot as its always set up ready and waiting,the warm currents from inside can play havoc but its nearly always freezing up there so not as bad as it sounds,
nothing beats being outside in the garden with it,but for ease of use its OK where it is for now
Virtually no stray light gets to the mirror too,
Its not quite an observatory set up as the Tripod legs do get the occasional bump
but a lot of my observing is grab and go so the loft if a good place till I get the obs built (yeah .. can see my gf agreeing to that
)
JJ..
nothing beats being outside in the garden with it,but for ease of use its OK where it is for now

Virtually no stray light gets to the mirror too,
Its not quite an observatory set up as the Tripod legs do get the occasional bump

but a lot of my observing is grab and go so the loft if a good place till I get the obs built (yeah .. can see my gf agreeing to that

JJ..

aint no speed limit where im comin from ..
lets hit the highway doing 69
ETX 125
Meade Series 4000 box set
lets hit the highway doing 69
ETX 125
Meade Series 4000 box set
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:38 am
- Location: Suffolk
- Contact:
I have had 2 Telescopes and none of those were ever used outside, and I think seeing as my scope is set up aiming towards the sky ready to use I use it more.
I feel that having to pick it all up, drag it outside, set it up, and recover from all that hard work I would soon go off the idea of sky watching, apart from that would the sky still be clear by the time I got it ready? maybe not.
David
I feel that having to pick it all up, drag it outside, set it up, and recover from all that hard work I would soon go off the idea of sky watching, apart from that would the sky still be clear by the time I got it ready? maybe not.
David
Member of SPA.