Canon 5DSr

For those interested in imaging and image processing with DSLR, CCD, webcam or film.

Moderators: joe, Brian, Guy Fennimore

Post Reply
David Frydman
Posts: 5341
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:25 am
Contact:

Canon 5DSr

Post by David Frydman »

. Anyone fancy one of these new 50.6 megapixel full frame digital SLRs?

It has 2 digic 6 processors, and has slots for SD cards and CompactFlash cards.

There are two models, I think one has a filter and one not.

Only £3200 for the body, although I don't know if that's the same price for both.

I just noticed this new camera today.

I think the full raw files might be 150 MB.
My friends Nikon TIFF files are 105 MB, and that only has about 36 or 38 megapixels.

Regards, David

Brian
Posts: 3653
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Wellingborough
Contact:

Re: Canon 5DSr

Post by Brian »

Dear David,

somewhat beyond my budget I'm afraid. Anyway, much of the imaging excitement seems centred on the Canon 7D Mk2 at the moment,

Regards,
Brian
52.3N 0.6W
Wellingborough UK.

254mm LX90 on Superwedge, WO ZS66SD, Helios 102mm f5 on EQ1, Hunter 11x80, Pentax 10x50
ASI120MC Toucam Pros 740k/840k/900nc mono, Pentax K110D
Ro-Ro roof shed

PRBenson
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 9:06 am
Contact:

Re: Canon 5DSr

Post by PRBenson »

A lot depends on what you want from a DSLR of course. Personally I only dabbled with astrophotography using DSLRs and I have to say I was impressed with the low noise performance of my 5D mk2 compared with previous Canon models I have owned using the APS-C sized sensors. To me that showed the benefit of the full frame sensor.

When I upgraded my mk2 I checked out the options and decided to go with the 5D mk3. Mainly because a 2nd hand mk3 in virtually new condition became available at a 'too good to refuse' price. There is no doubt that the higher pixel count of the 5Dsr makes it the camera of choice for those who place greatest importance in detail level. However as far as I know the noise performance of the 5Dsr at higher ISO settings is not as good as the 5D mk3 which would be an issue for astrophotography.

When the price of the 5Dsr comes down a bit I will consider it as an upgrade for my mk3 but till then I'm quite happy with what I have.
TMB152;Tak TOA150/FSQ106ED;Lunt LS152T/LS60THa;Orion 16" Dobsonian;Meade 14" LX200GPS
Canon 5DmkIII;DMK 21AU618;ASI 120M
AP 1200GTO;EQ6 Pro

PRBenson
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 9:06 am
Contact:

Re: Canon 5DSr

Post by PRBenson »

Further to my post yesterday I have now read a few reviews about the 5Dsr and these confirmed that the low light performance is nowhere near as good as the 5D mk3.

The higher pixel count of the 5Dsr means the pixel size is inevitably smaller by as much as 2um. While recommended as a daytime landscape/nature/studio camera, the 5Dsr is clearly not designed for astrophotographers.

I read recently that Canon are going to introduce another model to their range which has an upper iso range running to about 4 million! With a price tag of around $30,000 it ain't cheap but you can take pictures in virtually total darkness!
TMB152;Tak TOA150/FSQ106ED;Lunt LS152T/LS60THa;Orion 16" Dobsonian;Meade 14" LX200GPS
Canon 5DmkIII;DMK 21AU618;ASI 120M
AP 1200GTO;EQ6 Pro

Post Reply