Lunar Reconnaisance Orbiter's Moon ..

Hubble, probes to the planets etc

Moderators: Guy Fennimore, joe, Brian

Post Reply
brian livesey
Posts: 5621
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:05 am
Location: Lancashire
Contact:

Lunar Reconnaisance Orbiter's Moon ..

Post by brian livesey »

A composite of our satellite, courtesy of the LRO: http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap110303.html .
brian
brian livesey
Posts: 5621
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:05 am
Location: Lancashire
Contact:

Post by brian livesey »

Sharp as this picture is, the resolution is only as much as I can see in my SKYWATCHER 70mm refractor.
It goes to show how much lunar detail can be resolved even with a small 'scope.
brian
Brian
Posts: 3748
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Wellingborough
Contact:

Post by Brian »

Dear Brian,

do you refer to the APOD image, or to the 549MB high-resolution image from the LRO site? At 145m/pixel, I thought the resolution would take some beating,

Regards,
Brian
52.3N 0.6W
Wellingborough UK.

254mm LX90 on Superwedge, WO ZS66SD, Helios 102mm f5 on EQ1, Hunter 11x80, Pentax 10x50
ASI120MC Toucam Pros 740k/840k/900nc mono, Pentax K110D
Ro-Ro roof shed
David Frydman
Posts: 5366
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:25 am
Contact:

Post by David Frydman »

The moon from memory is about 2160miles across.
Say an average size of 30arc minutes equals 1 arc minute for 72 statute miles. Which is about unaided eye best resolution.
1 arcsecond equals 1.2milse.
If we are talking black spots on light background or white spots on black background a 70mm scope might resolve about 1.5 miles or say 2.5km.
for a wall or linear feature a width of 250 metres might be seen with a long wall with say a dark shadow.

So it depends how the 145 metres per pixel is defined.
For a white or dark spot on high contrast background much more detail should be visible in the high resolution photo than with a 70mm scope, and even the best amateur digital photographers would struggle to achieve that wit say an 11 inch scope.
However if the high resolution photo doesn't do better than 145metres for a straight wall, although a 70mm might not compete but i think a high quality 100mm or 120mm refractor or Maksutov might.

Regards, David.
brian livesey
Posts: 5621
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:05 am
Location: Lancashire
Contact:

Post by brian livesey »

The resolution I was referring to is what I see in the APOD as presented on the computer screen. It corresponds to the amount of detail I can see in the 70mm refractor.
brian
Post Reply