+1 for the Startravel. I have the Helios version from 2000, on an EQ1 and with a simple motor drive added on the RA axis. I've used it visually and for imaging with a webcam and I think it's a good value in spite of the drawbacks - lightweight equatorial head and some blue fringing on bright objects. I bought a Baader "contrast booster" eyepiece filter to use with it - this cuts the blue, making objects appear warmer and for instance helping to make Jupiter's belts stand out a little better. I did a lot of lunar and white-light solar imaging with that scope, some of my lunar images were used in Peter Grego's "Solar System Observers Guide" and "Moon Observers Guide" at the time , so they can't have been too bad
ATB,
Brian 52.3N 0.6W
Wellingborough UK. 254mm LX90 on Superwedge, WO ZS66SD, Helios 102mm f5 on EQ1, Hunter 11x80, Pentax 10x50
ASI120MC Toucam Pros 740k/840k/900nc mono, Pentax K110D
Ro-Ro roof shed
Just thought I would mention that Mike's Startravel is on the sturdy Altazimuth AZ3 mount, which does not need the fiddly polar alignment of an equatorial mount.
The basic scope comes with a 20x and 50x eyepiece I think, so with experience one would get a higher magnification eyepiece.
With an altazimuth mount it helps to have a wider field say 5mm eyepiece to more easily find and follow say a planet at say 100x.