It is currently Thu Jun 04, 2020 7:50 am

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:17 pm 
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 11:24 am
Posts: 4382
Location: Greenwich, London
Electronic News Bulletin No. 257 2008 December 12

Here is the latest round-up of news from the Society for Popular
Astronomy. The SPA is Britain's liveliest astronomical society, with
members all over the world. We accept subscription payments online
at our secure site and can take credit and debit cards. You can join
or renew via a secure server or just see how much we have to offer by


If you are not already a member of the SPA, now is a great time to
join! We are offering to those who receive ENBs and are not already
members a SPECIAL JOINING PRICE of only £12.00, saving £4.00 on
the usual UK annual rate. (Overseas rates vary but discount still applies
-- see our website for details.)

Join NOW by going to our secure website at and
click the 'Join Online' button. To claim your discount enter JOINPROMO
when asked for your voucher reference. To join by post send your
details with payment to SPA Membership, 36 Fairway, Keyworth,
Nottingham, NG125DU, quoting reference JOINPROMO.

Please Note -- This offer is valid only until 2008 December 31 and does
not apply to renewals of membership.

By Emily Baldwin

Looking for the perfect Christmas gift for a budding young astronomer?
Then how about a gift subscription to the SPA's Young Stargazers' club?
For just £10 a year, Young Stargazers receive an A4 file packed with
information, from how to choose a telescope or binoculars, to an A-Z of
astronomical terms, night-sky observing projects, and a guide to the
world's biggest telescopes. The welcome pack also comes with a badge,
pen and stickers, and all members receive the main SPA publications
too, such as Popular Astronomy, which has dedicated Young Stargazer
pages, four times a year. In January, we'll be featuring a
competition to win a Meade MySKY worth £300 -- another great reason
to join up! Sign up by December 15 to receive the pack in time for
Christmas. The Young Stargazers section is open to anyone under the
age of 16. To subscribe click on

By Alastair McBeath, SPA Meteor Section Director

Early indications are that the meteorites recovered from Alberta and
Saskatchewan in western Canada, following the brilliant fireball
imaged from the same region on November 20-21 (as discussed last
time), were ordinary chondrites. Several were recovered from a farm
appropriately named Lone Rock in Saskatechewan, plus others
elsewhere, including one weighing about 13 kg, though it is not clear
where or when this object was found, and it may not have been
associated with this recent fireball. Searches were continuing in the
area, with the oval strewnfield for meteorites possibly linked to this
meteor initially estimated as roughly 8 km by 3 km.

Closer to home, a number of bright fireballs were spotted from the
British Isles in late November and very early December, from reports
sent in to the Section, with at least four separate events seen between
November 25-26 and December 1-2 alone. Those for which
appropriate details were available are listed on the Section's "Recent
Fireball Sightings" webpage, at . Events seen
from multiple sites included one at ~20:15 UT on November 18-19
(seen from Hants & Devon), and another around 21:25-21:26 UT on
December 1-2 (Manchester, West Midlands & Cornwall). The latter
may have been over south Wales or the seas adjacent. Anyone who
witnessed one of these UK fireballs (a fireball is any meteor of
magnitude -3 or brighter), or any others, should send in a full report as
soon as possible. Details to provide and where to send them can be
found on the "Fireball Observing" webpage at: .

By Alastair McBeath, SPA Meteor Section Director

First quarter on January 4 will mean the Moon is a waxing crescent for
the 2009 Quadrantid maximum, due on January 3, around 13h UT. This
timing is naturally in British daylight, if it proves accurate, and as the
shower's peak is typically short and sharp, it may be we shall see little
of its best from here. However, the shower's radiant is circumpolar, set
in a fairly starless void of northern Boötes, once part of a now-discarded
constellation, the Wall Quadrant, at RA 15h20m, Dec +49°. This means
it is very low during the first half of the night (lowest in the early evening),
and is only properly observable after midnight UT. As the Moon will set
on January 2-3 before 23h UT, it is possible we may still see something
of the rising activity from the shower, particularly in the hours before
dawn on January 3. Maximum Zenithal Hourly Rates (ZHRs) from the
Quadrantids have been around 120 in recent times, though the highest
value does vary somewhat from year to year. It can be as low as 60, or
up to 200, and has occasionally persisted for a couple of hours close to
its best level (most recently last year, when the visual peak was also
about 3 to 4 hours later than expected, with ZHRs of about 80 - see the
reports in ENBs 236, at , and 238, .

As the 2008 results suggested, the peak time may alter slightly too, and
some returns since 2000 seem to have produced an additional,
primarily radio meteor, maximum about 9-12 hours after the visual one.
If this happens again, January 3-4 may also be worth watching on if
clear skies appear, as the Moon then will be setting around, or a little
after, midnight UT for our latitudes. Oddly, while 2008 brought two radio
maxima again, the first was roughly six hours before the visual
maximum! Fainter radio and telescopic Quadrantids have been
observed to peak up to 14 hours before the main visual event in the
past as well, which may hold out some limited hope for quite healthy
activity in any very transparent, very dark, clear skies on January 2-3.
Quadrantids are medium-speed meteors, often reasonably bright near
the visual maximum. Much lower numbers of them should be present
from about January 1-5.

For more information on January's likely meteor activity, see the meteor
activity webpage at: . Good luck, and clear

Lowell Observatory

Lowell astronomers have measured abundances of five molecular
species in the comae of 150 comets and discovered that one of them,
96P/Machholz 1, has an unusual chemistry. Although Machholz 1 was
discovered in 1986, compositional measurements took place only during
the comet's 2007 apparition. Its anomaly is that the molecule
cyanogen (CN) is depleted by a factor of about 72 from the average of
other comets. The cause of that chemical anomaly is unknown, but each
of three possible explanations points to important (but differing and
mutually inconsistent) constraints on the evolution of comets.

One possible explanation is that Machholz 1 did not originate
in our Solar System, but escaped from another star. In that case,
the other star's proto-planetary disc might have had a lower abundance
of carbon, resulting in all carbon-bearing compounds having lower
abundances. It has been proposed that a large fraction of comets in
our own Solar System has escaped into interstellar space, so we might
expect that many comets formed around other stars would also have
escaped. Some of them could have crossed paths with the Sun, and
Machholz 1 might be an interstellar interloper.

Another possible explanation for Machholz 1's anomalous composition is
that it formed even farther from the Sun, in a colder or more extreme
environment, than other comets studied.

The third possibility is that Machholz 1 originated as a carbon-chain-
depleted comet but extreme heat altered its chemistry. While no other
comet has exhibited chemical changes due to heating by the Sun,
Machholz 1 has an orbit that takes it to well inside Mercury's orbit
every 5 years. We might therefore suspect that repeated high-
temperature cooking is the cause of its unusual composition, but the
only other comet known to show CN depletion has not been subjected to
such high temperatures.

University of Central Florida

Cassini has shown that Saturn's satellite Enceladus has geysers
emitting plumes of water vapour and ice particles. Scientists have
come to the unremarkable conclusion that a water reservoir deep below
the icy crust of Enceladus is the source of the plumes. The ice
grains would condense from vapour escaping from the water source and
stream through the cracks in the ice crust on their way into space.
Another idea, that the plumes of gas and dust are caused by
evaporation of volatile ice freshly exposed to space when Saturn's
tidal forces open vents near the south pole, is being discounted,
because observations do not agree with the predicted timing of such
faults opening and closing as a result of tidal tension and


Three undergraduates from Leiden University in the Netherlands have
discovered an extra-solar planet. The planet, which turned up during
their research project, is about five times as massive as Jupiter.
It was discovered from its brightness variations, among nearly 16,000
stars which had been observed by the OGLE survey once or twice per
night for about four years between 1997 and 2000. The data had been
made public and offered a good test case for the students' algorithm,
which indicated that one of stars showed variations that could be due
to transits of a planet in front of it. The students then used the
2.2-m telescope at ESO to find out more about the star and the
possible planet. To make sure that it was a planet and not a brown
dwarf or a small star that was causing the brightness variations, they
needed to resort to spectroscopy, and were permitted to use the Very
Large Telescope at Paranal.

The planet has an orbital period of about 2.5 days. It is only 3
million miles from its star, making it very hot and much larger than
normal planets. The spectroscopy also showed that the star is of
earlier type than the Sun, with a surface temperature of almost 7000
degrees. It is the hottest star that has been found to have a planet,
and is rotating very fast. The radial-velocity method that has
discovered most extra-solar planets is less efficient on fast-rotating

Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

Astronomers have found evidence that brown dwarfs form like stars.
Observing in the far infra-red, they detected molecules of carbon
monoxide shooting outward from an object known as ISO-Oph 102. Such
molecular outflows are typically seen coming from young stars or
proto-stars. However, the ISO object has an estimated mass of 60
Jupiters, so it is thought to be a brown dwarf rather than a star.
Brown dwarfs have masses between 15 and 75 Jupiters, intermediate
between planets and stars; the theoretical minimum mass for a star to
sustain nuclear fusion is 75 Jupiter masses. It is not clear whether
they form like stars, from the gravitational collapse of gas clouds,
or if they form like planets, agglomerating rocky material until they
grow massive enough to draw in nearby gas.

A star forms when a cloud of interstellar gas draws itself together
through gravity, growing denser and hotter until fusion ignites. If
the initial gas cloud is rotating, that rotation will speed up as it
collapses, by the law of conservation of angular momentum. In order
to gather mass, the proto-star must shed its surplus angular momentum.
It somehow manages to do so by ejecting material in opposite
directions as a bipolar outflow. Brown dwarfs are less massive than
stars, so there is less gravity available to pull them together, and
astronomers have debated whether they could form in the same way.
Previous observations have hinted that they could, and the discovery
of the bipolar molecular outflow from ISO-Oph 102, albeit with much
smaller mass and speed than typical outflows from proto-stars, offers
support to the idea; so whether an object ends up as a brown dwarf or
a star may depends only on the amount of material available -- the
process is the same.

U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington

On 2008 December 31, a leap second will be interpolated into
Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, the successor to GMT). There will be
seven pips instead of six; the sequence of seconds markers will be
2008 December 31d 23h 59m 59s, 23h 59m 60s, 2009 January 1d 0h 0m 0s.
It will be the 24th leap second to be added to UTC, a uniform
time-scale maintained by atomic clocks since 1972. Historically, time
was based on the mean rotation of the Earth with respect to celestial
bodies. The invention of atomic clocks permitted the definition of a
much more precise time scale that is independent of the Earth's
rotation. In 1970 an international agreement established two time
scales -- one based on the Earth's rotation and another based on
atomic time. The problem is that the Earth's rotation is gradually
slowing down; that necessitates the occasional insertion of a 'leap
second' into the atomic time scale in order to keep the two within 0.9
second of one another. The International Earth Rotation and Reference
Systems Service (IERS) monitors the difference between the two time
scales and calls for leap seconds to be inserted when necessary
(always at the end of either June or December). Since 1972, leap
seconds have needed to be added at intervals that have ranged from 6
months to 7 years; the last one was on 2005 December 31.

Bulletin compiled by Clive Down

(c) 2008 the Society for Popular Astronomy

 Profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group